Access
watchdog reveals that a tiny percentage of students in England who are entitled
to a full bursary end up at Oxford or Cambridge universities
Fewer than 1% of the poorest
university students in England go to Oxford and Cambridge, the government's higher
education access watchdog revealed today.
Last year, 2,024 students at
Oxbridge received a full bursary – only eligible to those whose family income
is £25,000 or less each year, a report by the Office for Fair Access found.
This is just 0.88% of the
230,289 students who claimed bursaries at universities in England.
In contrast, 10,827 students
attending Liverpool John Moores University and the University of East London
claimed a full bursary – 4.7% of the total for the whole country.
The watchdog released the
figures in a report on how much universities spend on bursaries and
scholarships for the poorest students.
A spokeswoman from Oxford
said the university had "recognised for some time that we do not have as
high a proportion of students receiving full bursaries as many other
universities".
Oxford spends nearly £3m each
year trying to encourage under-represented groups of young people to apply to
university, she said. She added that the university offers one of the most
generous bursaries in the country, providing £10,550 over three years compared
with the sector average of £2,940.
The watchdog calculated how
much of the extra income that universities receive from charging fees is spent
on recruiting and encouraging poor students to take up places. The extra income
is the additional money that universities receive per student for charging over
£1,225 in fees.
On average, universities
spent 25.8% of their additional income on bursaries and scholarships for the
poorest students and "outreach" activities encouraging deprived
pupils to consider going to university, the report found. The year before last
they spent 25%.
The report found that while
some universities spend as much as 45% on the poorest students, others spend
less than a fifth. Southampton and Sheffield universities spent 17.5% and 19%
respectively. Cambridge spent 25%, while Oxford spent 31%. Thames Valley University
spends 45.4% of its additional income on bursaries and scholarships.
The findings prompted the
National Union of Students (NUS) to accuse university leaders of
"greedily" keeping their fee income to themselves, rather than
spending it on deprived youngsters.
"The regulation that
surrounds the charging of top-up fees is farcical and has allowed greedy
university heads with the worst record on access to ask for huge student
contributions and spend less on outreach than those with a better record at
getting poorer students onto their courses," said Aaron Porter, NUS
president.
However, the watchdog pointed
out that universities with a smaller pool of poor students would only be able
to give out a smaller sum in bursaries and scholarships than those with large
numbers of deprived young people.
The report shows that the
proportion of the poorest students who are claiming bursaries and scholarships
has jumped to 96% of those who are eligible. About 90% of those eligible were
claiming one in 2007-08. Just over 346,000 students from low-income families
claimed a bursary last year, and 70% of them were eligible for the maximum sum.
Universities can decide how
much they give to the poorest students as bursaries and scholarships. On
average, they awarded £980 for the full bursary.
The lecturers' trade union,
the University and College Union, said the amount a poor student received as a
bursary had become a lottery that was determined according to where they
studied.
Sally Hunt, UCU's general
secretary, said it was "ludicrous that students' financial aid is decided
in such a random and unfair way".
The union is calling for a
nationally set bursary scheme.
But the Russell Group said
this would create many losers and few winners. "There would be relatively
small increases to a standard bursary, but many high-achieving, low-income
students would lose out," Wendy Piatt, director general of the Russell
Group, said. She added that if universities were allowed to charge higher fees,
"this would provide them with more resources to recruit and support
students from under-represented groups".
An independent review is looking into whether tuition fees, currently at £3,225 a year, should rise. It will report this autumn.
Source: Guardian.co.uk