180,000
university applicants to be turned away, despite empty places
Universities
will start the new academic year with thousands of unfilled places, despite
turning record numbers of youngsters away because fear of swingeing fines for
over-recruitment will prompt universities to cut back on offers to students.
This comes at
a time when the lack of job prospects has led to a record 660,953 applications
– almost 200,000 more than there are places. One lecturers' leader described
the situation as "tragic".
Vice-chancellors
are fearful of recruiting too many students through the clearing system in case
they incur massive government fines. Last year those that went above the target
number of students set by the Government faced fines totalling £4m – which
would be crippling when coupled with public-spending cuts.
Experts
believe there is unlikely to be an increase on the 481,854 places on offer last
year despite the Government providing 10,000 emergency places. That means that
around 180,000 applicants are set to be disappointed in their search for
university – although some university vice-chancellors predict the eventual
figure will be as high as 250,000.
The situation
will compound the problem of youth unemployment. Some 923,000 16- to
24-year-olds (one in five) are jobless, with many hundreds of thousands more in
"hidden" unemployment, classifying themselves as "students"
even though they have no confirmed places in colleges.
The
unemployment rate for 16 and 17-year-olds is especially high – 35.9 per cent,
more than one in three of those not in education – in part because graduates
are taking school leavers' jobs. Those leaving school face the worst labour
market since the Second World War, fuelling fears of a "lost
generation" consigned to the dole queue.
Deirdre
Hughes, of the Institute of Careers Guidance, said: "Out of the last 25
years, this is the worst our most experienced higher education advisers have
experienced for young people. The difficulty is that with the cuts in public
services there is not going to be the same number of jobs available either.
It's a double whammy for them.
"Students
have to think carefully about their motivation for wanting to go to university
and other options available to them. It may be that higher education isn't the
best route for them."
Writing for The
Independent, the vice-chancellor of Liverpool John Moores University,
Michael Brown, explains: "In normal times... university admissions tutors
offer more places to candidates than actually exist in the same way as airlines
overbook to be sure of filling their planes. This year, however, they won't be
able to do that because risks cannot be taken."
His comments
are backed up by other vice-chancellors. Mike Thorne, of Anglia Ruskin
University, said: "People are very cautious about not going over their
target number. The attitude is to make it a bit under rather than over."
One of the
reasons for the universities' dilemma is a change over the funding system. In
past years, they have escaped fines if they were 5 per cent above or below the
Government's target figure. Now they are just given the target and fined £3,700
per student if they exceeded it – and docked the same amount for every student
below it.
Dr Phil
Cardew, pro vice-chancellor of London South Bank University, which has been
given 300 extra places, added: "I would rather err on the side of caution
than not."
Professor
David Green, vice-chancellor of the University of Worcester, said: "£1bn
of cuts already mean that universities simply cannot afford to pay fines for
'over-recruiting' above the control number which government has imposed."
Student
leaders demanded an immediate relaxation of the fines system. "The
Government has made a mistake in slashing funding to universities but there is
still time this year to drop these ill-advised fines and to make sure that at
the very least universities are able to offer places to all the students that
they can receive funding for," said Aaron Porter, president of the
National Union of Students.
"It is a
solution that will not involve spending funds that have not already been
budgeted for and will ensure that as many students as possible can start their
university courses this year."
Sally Hunt,
the general secretary of the University and College Union, added: "The
fact that there are likely to be empty chairs in lecture halls and seminar
rooms because universities cannot risk recruiting students is tragic when we
consider that 200,000 students are still likely to miss out on a university
place this year.
"The
situation exposes the folly of the decision to cut student places and to impose
such heavy penalties for universities who over-recruit."
A spokesman
for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, which has
responsibility for university education, said: "There is increased demand
this year which is why the Government has funded an additional 10,000 student
places. But it is for individual universities to manage their own admissions.
We believe clearing can work to match students with places and this year there
will be more students at university than ever before."
Source:
Independent.co.uk